MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3026300521 · doi:10.1002/lol2.10158

Interactive effects of iron and temperature on the growth of <scp><i>Fragilariopsis cylindrus</i></scp>

2020· article· en· W3026300521 on OpenAlexafffund
Loay J. Jabre, Erin M. Bertrand

Bibliographic record

VenueLimnology and Oceanography Letters · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSimons Foundation
KeywordsPhytoplanktonGlobal warmingEnvironmental scienceEcologyGrowth rateEcosystemClimate changeBiologyChemistryOceanographyNutrientGeologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Iron and temperature are important drivers controlling phytoplankton growth in the Southern Ocean (SO). Most studies examining phytoplankton responses to these variables consider them independently, testing responses to changing temperature under constant iron and vice versa. Consequently, we lack a phenomenological and mechanistic understanding of how concurrent changes in these variables influence primary productivity. Here, we used a matrix of three temperatures and eight iron levels to examine changes in growth rate, photophysiology, and size in Fragilariopsis cylindrus . Temperature and iron interactively influenced growth; warming decreased iron demand, allowing cells to maintain half‐maximal growth rate at lower iron concentrations. We also observed possible mechanisms underpinning this phenomenon: warming increased light‐harvesting cross section and reduced cell size, thereby increasing light energy availability and iron uptake efficiency. These results suggest that interactive iron‐warming effects could lead to larger increases in SO phytoplankton growth than those currently predicted by marine ecosystem models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.347

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.157
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLimnology and Oceanography LettersSame topicMarine and coastal ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207