“The World is There and We are Here:” “Otherness” and the Designation of Space in the Prose of Nava Semel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nava Semel’s (1954-2017) fiction seeks to portray the oppression of “others” as part of a white male system that excludes those who are different by use of violent means, and the main depictive tool which Semel employs in her works is geographical space. Accordingly, she presents a variety of locations and affinities related to the oppression of “others” in alternating spaces— urban, peripheral, supervised and space-off. Due to the absence of a space where the “other” can hope to find autonomy, and since utopia is unrealizable, he or she is left with very few tools of survival. Some of these are solidarity with additional “others,” providing descriptive accounts—written or other—that perpetuate the marginally-perceived identity while granting it a genuine place, or the stark acceptance of one’s identity despite the painful price it exacts. In Nava Semel’s prose, the protagonists may visit or chance upon numerous places, their travels may appear to be potentially threatening (“Private Holocaust”), or as facilitating growth and reconciliation (Australian Wedding), or the leading character may appear to settle down and live a sheltered life (in Israel, for example, in the novel, And the Rat Laughed). Semel’s writings may focus on providing professional fulfillment or defying gender norms (a female candidate for the United States presidency in the novel, Isra Isle), or even on an opportunity to become familiar with the world of a beloved yet baffling family member (Isra Isle, third part, as well as Australian Wedding). In any case, setting out on a journey poses a challenge to the protagonist’s world as well as to the inhabitants of the space of his or her destination. This confrontation between the “other” and the hegemony, as presented in this article, is at the core of Semel’s prose.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".