Uso de extracto de romero y ácido ascórbico en la conservación refrigerada de carne de cerdo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar el efecto del extracto de romero, del ácido ascórbico y de una combinación de ambos (todos ellos adicionados por aspersión) durante la comercialización de carne de cerdo conservada a 4ºC y envasada en bandejas plásticas cubiertas con film de PVC (cloruro de polivinilo) o bajo vacío. Durante el almacenamiento se evaluó el pH, color, índice de rojez, oxidación de lípidos, recuento total de aerobios mesófilos, mermas por goteo, aroma a carne en mal estado y aromas no característicos. Los resultados sugieren que, independientemente del sistema de envasado (bandejas con film de PVC o vacío), la aplicación por aspersión sobre la superficie de extracto de romero dio como resultado una disminución de la oxidación lipídica, sin afectar otras características de calidad. El ácido ascórbico no mostró un efecto antioxidante.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".