[Comparison of the Geochemical Characteristics of Karst Springs of a Vertically Zoned Climate Region under Human Activity: A Case of Shuifang Spring and Bitan Spring in the Jinfo Mountain Area, Chongqing].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
in Shuifang Spring, which peaked in winter and summer, while hydrochemical parameters of Bitan Spring changed smoothly throughout the year. The water quality of Bitan Spring is better than Shuifang Spring (Shuifang Spring water is classified as Class Ⅳ). PCA shows that the water-rock interaction was the first controlling factor. Hotel sewage discharge and ions from precipitation had important effects on Shuifang Spring and Bitan Spring, respectively. In addition, the effects of soil erosion and leaching caused by precipitation also impact on the water quality of two springs to some extent. The geochemical susceptibility of Shuifang Spring was greater than that of Bitan Spring; therefore, corresponding measures should be formulated according to the characteristics of these differently elevated karst systems when exploiting groundwater resources. This is especially the case for the treatment of hotel sewage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".