Civil action for rape in Malaysia / Najmu Fatihah Mohd Zin … [et al.]
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research paper analyzed on the viability of implementing civil action for rape in Malaysia with references made to other countries: the United States, the United Kingdom and, Canada. Basically in Malaysia, there were rarely civil actions taken for the crime of rape unlike in the Western Countries. This research paper is to help understanding the civil action for rape better and to determine the viability of taking such action in Malaysia. Based on the research done, some recommendations were made with the intention to improve the position of victims of rape when it comes to getting monetary compensation. The first chapter goes into the essences and the structures of the research. In the second chapter, it focused on the position of law in Malaysia regarding compensating victims of rape, the advantages of taking civil action for rape and also, the disadvantages of taking such action. The third chapter discussed on the position of civil action for rape in the United States, the United Kingdom and, Canada. Apart from that, Chapter Four lays out findings of the research based on several interviews conducted. Lastly, Chapter Five provides the conclusion and also some recommendations for the implementation of civil action for rape in Malaysia
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".