MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3026773431 · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2020.04.006

Deregulated Regulators: Disease-Causing cis Variants in Transcription Factor Genes

2020· review· en· W3026773431 on OpenAlexafffund
Robin van der Lee, Solenne Correard, Wyeth W. Wasserman

Bibliographic record

VenueTrends in Genetics · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Rare Diseases
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekZonMwMichael Smith Health Research BCBC Children's HospitalGenome British ColumbiaProvincial Health Services AuthorityBC Children’s Hospital FoundationCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGenome Canada
KeywordsBiologyGeneGeneticsTranscription factorGenomeComputational biologyRegulatory sequenceDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Whole-genome sequencing is accelerating identification of noncoding variants that disrupt gene expression, although reports of such regulatory variants implicated in disease remain rare. A notable subset of described variants affect transcription factor (TF) genes and other master regulators in cis through dosage effects. From the literature, we compiled 46 regulatory variants linked to 40 TF genes implicated in rare diseases. We discuss the genomic geography of these variants and the evidence presented for their potential pathogenicity. To help advance research on candidate disease variants into the literature, we introduce an evidence framework specific to regulatory variants, which are under-represented in current variant classification guidelines. The clinical research interpretation of patient genomes may be advanced by considering regulatory variants, particularly those that deregulate TF genes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTrends in GeneticsSame topicGenomics and Rare DiseasesFrench-language works237,207