MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3026776245 · doi:10.9778/cmajo.20190089

Characteristics of health care related to mental health and substance use disorders among Community Health Centre clients in Ontario: a population-based cohort study

2020· article· en· W3026776245 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Richard Booth, Lucie Richard, Lihua Li, Salimah Z. Shariff, Jennifer Rayner

Bibliographic record

VenueCMAJ Open · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersSchulich School of Medicine and DentistrySchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western UniversityOntario Ministry of Health and Long-Term CareAcademic Medical Organization of Southwestern OntarioLawson Health Research Institute
KeywordsMedicineMental healthMental illnessHealth carePopulationPsychiatryCohortOdds ratioLogistic regressionDescriptive statisticsFamily medicineEnvironmental healthGerontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Community Health Centre (CHC) client populations with a history of mental illness or substance use disorders, or both, are not described well in the literature. We identified CHC clients in Ontario with a history of health care related to mental health or substance use disorders, or both, and describe their demographic characteristics, health system use and related health risks in comparison to other people in the province with similar diagnoses who did not use CHC services. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study using provincial health administrative data among Ontario residents aged 21-105 years with a previously established medical history of a mental illness or substance use disorder, or both. We examined 3 groups: clients of CHC sites that serve at-risk priority populations (PPCHCs) who presented for care at a CHC between Apr. 1, 2014, and Mar. 31, 2015, clients of CHC sites that serve nonpriority populations (NPPCHCs) who presented for care at a CHC over the same period, and a community control group of patients with a history of health care use related to mental illness or substance use disorders, or both, in the 2 years before the index date who were not CHC clients. We used descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression to estimate the odds of psychiatric care and emergency department use within 1 year of the index date. RESULTS: = 15 208) were younger, experienced more residential instability and had an increased prevalence of medical comorbidities; they had higher odds of receiving care from a psychiatrist (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-1.33, and 1.47, 95% CI 1.41-1.53, respectively) and visiting an emergency department (adjusted OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.10-1.20, and 1.13, 95% CI 1.09-1.17, respectively) in the 1-year follow-up period. INTERPRETATION: Ontario CHC clients with mental health or substance use disorders had medically complex needs and were intensive users of the health care system. Specific interventions should be developed to better serve this vulnerable population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.318
Threshold uncertainty score0.742

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCMAJ OpenSame topicSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207