MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3026894109 · doi:10.1016/j.nrleng.2020.05.001

Incidence, prognosis, and prediction of haemorrhagic transformation after revascularisation for stroke

2020· article· en· W3026894109 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
P.B. García Jurado, E. Roldán Romero, M.E. Pérez Montilla, Roberto Valverde Moyano, I.M. Bravo Rey, Fernando Delgado Acosta, Francisco Bravo-Rodríguez

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurología (English Edition) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineModified Rankin ScaleLogistic regressionStroke (engine)Internal medicineIncidence (geometry)OcclusionComplicationRetrospective cohort studySurgeryCardiologyIschemic strokeIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Haemorrhagic transformation is a major complication of acute ischaemic stroke (AIS). We sought to determine the predictors and clinical impact of intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) after revascularisation therapy. We conducted a retrospective, single-centre study including 235 patients with AIS who underwent intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (IV-rtPA) therapy and/or endovascular treatment. A binary logistic regression model was used to determine the variables associated with ICH, parenchymal haematomas (PH), modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores, and mortality. ICH was detected in 57 (30 with PH) of 183 patients included. Mechanical thrombectomy, either alone (OR 3.3 [1.42-7.63], P = .005) or in combination with IV-rtPA (OR 3.39 [1.52-7.56], P = .003), was associated with higher risk of ICH, while higher Alberta Stroke Program Early CT scores (OR 0.71 [0.55-0.91], P = .007) were associated with lower risk. Patients with older age (OR 1.07 [1.02-1.13], P = .006) and occlusion of the terminal branch of the internal carotid artery (OR 4.03 [1.35-11.99], P = .012) had a higher risk of PH, while the use of IV-rtPA alone (OR 0.24 [0.08-0.68], P = .008) was associated with lower risk of PH. Only PH was associated with disability as measured by the mRS (OR 3.2 [1.17-8.76], P = .02) and higher mortality (OR 5.06 [1.65-15.5], P = .005). Greater understanding about the predictors of ICH, mRS scores, and mortality could enable better selection of patients and treatments. La transformación hemorrágica es una complicación importante del ictus isquémico agudo (IIA). El propósito del trabajo es analizar el impacto clínico y los factores predictores de las hemorragias intracraneales (HIC) tras terapia revascularizadora. Análisis retrospectivo monocéntrico de 235 pacientes con IIA tratados mediante trombólisis intravenosa (TIV) o tratamiento endovascular (TE). Se ha realizado un modelo de regresión logística binaria para determinar los factores asociados con las HIC, las hemorragias parenquimatosas (HP), la escala mRS y la mortalidad. De los 183 pacientes incluidos, 57 tuvieron HIC (30 HP). El TE mecánico (OR 3,3 [1,42-7,63], p = 0,005) y la TIV junto con TE mecánico (OR 3,39 [1,52-7,56], p = 0,003) se han asociado a mayor riesgo de HIC, mientras que valores altos de ASPECTS (OR 0,71 [0,55-0,91], p = 0,007) se han asociado a menor riesgo. Mayor edad (OR 1,07 [1,02-1,13], p = 0,006) y la oclusión de la carótida interna terminal (OR 4,03 [1,35-11,99], p = 0,012) han sido factores predictores de HP, mientras que haber recibido TIV exclusivamente (OR 0,24 [0,08-0,68], p = 0,008) se ha asociado con menor riesgo. Solo las HP se han asociado a valores invalidantes de mRS (OR = 3,2 [1,17-8,76], p = 0,02) y mayor mortalidad (OR 5,06 [1,65-15,5], p = 0,005). Una mejor comprensión de los factores predictores de HIC, mRS y mortalidad puede permitir una mejor selección de pacientes y tratamientos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score0.505

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurología (English Edition)Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207