Análisis performativo de la andragogía lingüística del Inglés para el desarrollo socio-cultural
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El artículo describe el resultado de un proceso de investigación enfocado en la singularidad de los adultos, como un grupo de estudiantes para el dominio de idioma extranjero, las ventajas y las desventajas de la madurez intelectual asociadas a la metodología moderna de enseñanza del idioma inglés. Este análisis determinar la importancia de tener en cuenta las peculiaridades de los estudiantes adultos en el dominio de un idioma extranjero, iniciando por los principios básicos de la andragogía, reflexionando sobre teoría del aprendizaje, y las razones por las cuales ésta se considera una rama separada de la pedagogía; se describen características psicológicas y relacionadas con la edad de los adultos que los distinguen de otros grupos de estudiantes; se estudia el concepto interdisciplinario de "atención", "memoria" y "pensamiento". Todo el estudio revela importantes cuestionamientos sobre las formas de pensamiento generaciones actuales y su legado para desarrollo cultural, artístico y social de los pueblos Latino Americanos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".