Spectropolarimetric follow-up of 8 rapidly rotating, X-ray bright FK Comae candidates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Our understanding of the evolved, rapidly rotating, magnetically active, and apparently single FK Comae stars is significantly hindered by their extreme rarity: only two stars in addition to FK Com itself are currently considered to be members of this class. Recently, a sample of more than 20 candidate FK Comae type stars was identified within the context of the Kepler–Swift Active Galaxies and Stars (KSwAGS) survey. We present an analysis of high-resolution Stokes V observations obtained using ESPaDOnS@CFHT for 8 of these candidates. We found that none of these targets can be considered members of the FK Comae class based primarily on their inferred rotational velocities and on the detection of spectroscopic binary companions. However, 2 targets show evidence of magnetic activity and have anomalously high projected rotational velocities (vsin i) relative to typical values associated with stars of similar evolutionary states. EPIC 210426551 has a $v\sin {i}=209\, {\rm km\, s}^{-1}$, an estimated mass of $1.07\, \mathrm{ M}_\odot$, and, based in part on its derived metallicity of [M/H] = −0.4, it is either an evolved main sequence (MS) star or a pre-MS star. KIC 7732964 has a mass of $0.84\, \mathrm{ M}_\odot$, lies near the base of the red giant branch, and exhibits a $v\sin {i}=23\, {\rm km\, s}^{-1}$. We find that these two objects have similar characteristics to FK Com (albeit less extreme) and that their rapid rotation may be inconsistent with that predicted for a single star evolutionary history. Additional observations are necessary in order to better constrain their evolutionary states and whether they have short-period binary companions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".