MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3026936279 · doi:10.3917/mss.026.0106

Volunteer organization characteristics and determinants of strategy, governance, performance : A review

2019· review· fr· W3026936279 on OpenAlexaff
Taı̈eb Hafsi, Hadj Nekka, Neila Zerguini

Bibliographic record

VenueManagement & Sciences Sociales · 2019
Typereview
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicNonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article traite de la gestion des organisations bénévoles (VO), un sujet peu étudié dans la littérature sur la stratégie et la gestion. Premièrement, le bénévolat est considéré comme (1) une activité librement décidée, faite pour des raisons altruistes, bénéficiant à quelqu’un d’autre qu’à celui qui le fait, (2) généralement effectué dans des organisations qui ont un personnel permanent; (3) est associé à des organisations à but non lucratif (NPO). Les organisations de bénévoles sont omniprésentes et si elles sont considérées ensemble, elles constitueront presque partout l’industrie dominante. Ensuite, ce qu’on sait de la gestion des organisations de bénévoles et des déterminants de leur performance est discuté. Cette recherche met l’accent sur la gouvernance et la gestion stratégique en relation avec la performance des organisations des bénévoles .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.738
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManagement & Sciences SocialesSame topicNonprofit Sector and VolunteeringFrench-language works237,207