MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3026970967 · doi:10.1002/mats.202000016

Conformation and Diffusivity of Ring and Linear Polyethylene Oxide in Aqueous Solution: Molecular Topology Dependent Concentration Effects and Comparison with Experimental Data

2020· article· en· W3026970967 on OpenAlexaff
Dimitrios G. Tsalikis, Terpsichori S. Alexiou, Panagiotis V. Alatas, Vlasis G. Mavrantzas

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Theory and Simulations · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMolecular dynamicsDiffusionAqueous solutionChemistryThermal diffusivityDilutionScalingRing (chemistry)Chemical physicsChain (unit)MoleculeTopology (electrical circuits)ThermodynamicsPolymerComputational chemistryPhysical chemistryPhysicsOrganic chemistryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Atomistic molecular dynamics simulations are performed on aqueous solutions of ring and linear polyethylene oxide (PEO) under good solvent conditions for the investigation of their conformation and diffusion dynamics. The systems simulated span a wide range of molecular weights (from 2 to 10 k) and polymer concentrations. In the limit of infinite dilution, both conformational and dynamic properties appear to be practically molecular topology independent as far as their dependence on chain length and concentration is concerned, and a very favorable agreement is observed with respect to relevant well‐established theoretical predictions, experimental data, and earlier simulation studies. Crossing over to the semidilute regime, molecular topology starts to bear a distinct effect on the observed conformations of the two different molecular geometries. On the other hand, the diffusion dynamics of PEO in the semidilute regime appears to be practically molecular topology independent judging from the dependence of the chain center‐of‐mass diffusivity on chain length and concentration. Indeed, and despite the fact that ring molecules exhibit consistently a faster dynamics than their linear homologs over the entire concentration range simulated, the estimated concentration scalings for both types of architecture are strikingly similar. The findings of this work are compared with scaling arguments and available experimental data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.226
Threshold uncertainty score0.353

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromolecular Theory and SimulationsSame topicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesFrench-language works237,207