MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3026972302 · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbaa030.503

M191. EFFECT OF BREXPIPRAZOLE ON ENGAGEMENT IN PATIENTS WITH SCHIZOPHRENIA: POST-HOC ANALYSIS OF THREE STUDIES

2020· article· en· W3026972302 on OpenAlexaff
Zahinoor Ismail, A. Pedersen, Michael E. Thase, Stine R. Meehan, Catherine Weiss, Klaus Groes Larsen, Dalei Chen, Anna‐Greta Nylander, Ross A. Baker, Roger S. McIntyre

Bibliographic record

VenueSchizophrenia Bulletin · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPositive and Negative Syndrome ScaleSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Partial agonistPsychologyAntipsychoticAdjunctive treatmentAtypical antipsychoticRandomized controlled trialPsychiatryPsychosocialAripiprazoleQuality of life (healthcare)PlaceboMedicinePsychosisInternal medicineAntagonistPsychotherapistReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background In schizophrenia, a patient’s quality of life and level of psychosocial functioning is dependent on two key domains: the severity of their psychotic symptoms, and the side effects of antipsychotic medication. In addition, people with schizophrenia experience motivation deficits, thus patient engagement is a key component of successful schizophrenia treatment outcomes. The present analyses investigated the effect of brexpiprazole (a serotonin–dopamine activity modulator that is a partial agonist at 5-HT1A and dopamine D2 receptors, and an antagonist at 5-HT2A and noradrenaline alpha1B/2C receptors, all at similar potency) on patient engagement. The concept of patient engagement stems from the collective post-marketing experience with brexpiprazole, and has been established in patients with MDD and an inadequate response to antidepressant treatments treated with adjunctive brexpiprazole. To explore the concept of engagement in schizophrenia, 11 out of the 30 items in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) were identified as relevant to capture patient improvement and well-being beyond an improvement of the core symptoms of schizophrenia. Methods The studies [Vector (NCT01396421), Beacon (NCT01393613) and Lighthouse (NCT01810380)] included patients aged 18–65 years experiencing an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia (DSM-IV-TR criteria), and who would benefit from hospitalization or continued hospitalization. Eligible patients were randomized to 6 weeks treatment with placebo or brexpiprazole ranging from doses of 0.25 to 4 mg/day depending on the study. The primary efficacy analysis in all three studies was the mean change in PANSS Total score from baseline (randomization) to Week 6. The PANSS was administered at weekly intervals. Items N1, N2, N3, N4, N5, N6, G6, G7, G13, G15, and G16 were selected from the PANSS as relevant items to capture patient engagement. In the present analysis, data were pooled for patients allocated to placebo and to a brexpiprazole dose in the range of 2–4 mg. Mean changes from baseline on the selected PANSS items were analyzed using a mixed model repeated measures approach. A Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed to validate whether changes in the selected items clustered together. Standardized effect sizes were also calculated. Results In the short-term studies, the PANSS scale was completed at baseline by a total of 1,378 patients, brexpiprazole 2–4 mg (n=863); placebo (n=515). At Week 6, an improvement (p<0.05) was observed on 10 out of the 11 selected items from the PANSS scale, with LS mean differences versus placebo in the range of -0.11 to -0.24. The PCA showed that the majority of the selected items cluster together, confirming the importance of the selected items for patient engagement/re-engagement with their lives. The standardized effect size for brexpiprazole versus placebo was -0.31 for the combined 11 selected items and of a similar magnitude as the effect size of the PANSS Total score (-0.32). Discussion 11 items from the PANSS scale were selected to capture patient re-engagement. The clustering, as shown by the PCA, validated the selection of the specific engagement items. The results of these exploratory post-hoc analyses suggest that treatment with brexpiprazole, in addition to improving symptoms of schizophrenia, has the potential to also improve patient well-being and engagement with life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.547
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSchizophrenia BulletinSame topicSchizophrenia research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207