MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3027024818 · doi:10.1080/1612197x.2020.1766182

Sport psychology services to professional athletes: working through COVID-19

2020· article· en· W3027024818 on OpenAlexaff
Robert J. Schinke, Αθανάσιος Παπαϊωάννου, Charles A. Maher, William D. Parham, Carsten Hvid Larsen, Richard D. Gordin, Stewart T. Cotterill

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSport Psychology and Performance
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSport psychologyAthletesPsychologyFandomEntertainmentCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Applied psychologyCoaching2019-20 coronavirus outbreakMedia studiesPublic relationsSociologyPsychotherapistVisual artsPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fandom around the world yearns for sports entertainment. Much of the discussions within the recent flurry of sport and exercise psychology writings have been focused on the challenging experiences ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.308

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0020.013
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0920.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sport and Exercise PsychologySame topicSport Psychology and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207