Service strategy based on Tri Kaya Parisudha, social media promotion, business values and business performance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In addition to implementing the hybrid business strategy, Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Bali also accommodate the values of local wisdom in Bali. One of the values of local wisdom in Bali is called Tri kaya Parisudha (TKP). The aim of this study is to determine the effect of service strategies based on TKP and social media promotion on business value and the impact on SME business performance in SMEs. AMOS-based Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) is the analysis technique used to examine the hypotheses in this study using a sample consists of 105 people. The results show that (1) TKP-based service strategy has a positive and significant effect on business performance; (2) Social media promotion has a positive and significant effect on business performance; (3) TKP-based service strategy has a positive and significant effect on business value; (4) social media promotion has a positive and significant effect on business value; (5) business value has a positive and significant effect on business performance. The theoretical implications from this research is that the application of service strategy based on TKP and social media promotion is a business strategy that is very important to improve the value of the businesses and to improve their performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".