MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3027281068 · doi:10.11575/prism/37855

Seismicity and tectonic interpretation of the Southern Rocky Mountain Trench near Valemount, British Columbia, Canada

2020· dissertation· en· W3027281068 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joshua Chris Shadday Purba

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInduced seismicityTrenchGeologyTectonicsSeismologyInterpretation (philosophy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Rocky Mountain Trench is a large geological feature in the Canadian Cordillera with complex structures. Although efforts to understand the structure of the trench have been conducted through refraction-seismic, reflection-seismic, and geological studies, detailed knowledge of the trench is still sparse but crucial to understanding its evolution. Here, I conduct a local seismic study that involves earthquake detection, arrival-time picking, earthquake location, and a tectonic interpretation of the Rocky Mountain Trench in the area of Valemount, British Columbia. I developed and employed a nonlinear, probabilistic multiple-earthquake location for earthquakes detected here. The location provides both earthquake locations and rigorous estimates of their uncertainties. Based on analysing one year of data, my catalogue includes 47 local earthquakes that I identified and located. The results of the multiple-earthquake location presented here illustrates uncertainty reduction in depth from 18 to 5 km compared to the depths of earthquakes calculated based on single-earthquake locations. This lower depth uncertainty permits better inferences of the tectonic development of the Rocky Mountain Trench. The earthquake locations determined here displays a change in the distribution of seismicity around Valemount. Seismicity extends to the west of the RMT and the south of Valemount. While to the north, the seismicity is primarily confined to the trench and areas to the east. The distribution of seismicity also supports the dome-shaped Malton Gneiss in the subsurface. Seismic velocities are consistent with metamorphic rocks and the presence of significant amount of quartz in crustal rocks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.105

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→Same topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques→French-language works237,207→