Self-supervised Robust Object Detectors from Partially Labelled Datasets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the object detection task, merging various datasets from similar contexts but with different sets of Objects of Interest (OoI) is an inexpensive way (in terms of labor cost) for crafting a large-scale dataset covering a wide range of objects. Moreover, merging datasets allows us to train one integrated object detector, instead of training several ones, which in turn resulting in the reduction of computational and time costs. However, merging the datasets from similar contexts causes samples with partial labeling as each constituent dataset is originally annotated for its own set of OoI and ignores to annotate those objects that are become interested after merging the datasets. With the goal of training \emph{one integrated robust object detector with high generalization performance}, we propose a training framework to overcome missing-label challenge of the merged datasets. More specifically, we propose a computationally efficient self-supervised framework to create on-the-fly pseudo-labels for the unlabeled positive instances in the merged dataset in order to train the object detector jointly on both ground truth and pseudo labels. We evaluate our proposed framework for training Yolo on a simulated merged dataset with missing rate $\approx\!48\%$ using VOC2012 and VOC2007. We empirically show that generalization performance of Yolo trained on both ground truth and the pseudo-labels created by our method is on average $4\%$ higher than the ones trained only with the ground truth labels of the merged dataset.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".