MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3027346379

Medical Scope:人工膵臓様デバイスによる血糖管理の未来

2019· article· ja· W3027346379 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
木村 真一郎, ほか

Bibliographic record

VenuePharma Medica · 2019
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldEngineering
TopicMilitary Technology and Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScope (computer science)BusinessComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

世界的に増加の一途を辿る糖尿病において,インスリン療法は重要な治療手段であるが,低血糖の危険を有するなど,改善の余地は大きい。そこで低血糖をきたさない良好な血糖コントロールを目的として,膵臓がもつ血糖応答性のインスリン放出機構を再現した人工膵臓様デバイスが開発されている。実臨床では携帯型の機械型人工膵臓様デバイスとして,持続血糖測定(CGM)機能を追加したインスリンポンプが使用可能である。また,われわれは独自に開発した血糖応答性のゲルを用いて,エレクトロニクスフリーの人工膵臓様デバイスを開発している。本稿ではわれわれの取り組みも交えて,人工膵臓様デバイスによる血糖管理の現状と,その未来について考察したい。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.702
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0720.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharma MedicaSame topicMilitary Technology and StrategiesFrench-language works237,207