MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3027461300 · doi:10.38165/jk.v10i2.12

HUBUNGAN DETERMINAN PERILAKU DENGAN PEMBERIAN ASI EKSKLUSIF

2020· article· id· W3027461300 on OpenAlexaff
Iin Kristianti, Nidya Tri Rosanty

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Kesehatan · 2020
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldMedicine
TopicPublic Health and Nutrition
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGynecologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ASI eksklusif adalah pemberian ASI saja tanpa tambahan makanan dan minuman lainnya kepada bayi sejak lahir sampai berusia 6 bulan. Pemberian ASI secara eksklusif dipengaruhi oleh berbagai faktor yang meliputi faktor pendidikan, pekerjaan, pengetahuan, keterpaparan terhadap informasi, dukungan keluarga dan dukungan petugas kesehatan. Cakupan pemberian ASI eksklusif di Kelurahan Wilayah Kerja UPT Puskesmas Pegambiran sebesar 54,7% dan belum memenuhi dari target 75%. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui hubungan antara determinan perilaku dengan pemberian ASI eksklusif di Kelurahan Pegambiran Wilayah Kerja UPT Puskesmas Pegambiran Kota Cirebon Tahun 2018. Rancangan penelitian ini adalah deskriptif analitik dengan pendekatan cross sectional. Populasi dalam penelitian ini berjumlah 154 bayi yang berumur 7-11 bulan, dengan jumlah sampel sebanyak 65 orang diambil secara propotional random sampling. Pengambilan data penelitian dengan menggunakan kuesioner dengan teknik wawancara. Uji analisis untuk melihat hubungan variabel bebas dan variabel terikat dengan uji Chi Square. Hasil uji statistik didapatkan bahwa pendidikan ibu (p value = 0,785), pekerjaan ibu (p value = 1.000), pegetahuan ibu (p value = 0,977), tidak ada hubungan dengan pemberian ASI eksklusif di Kelurahan Pegambiran Wilayah Kerja UPT Puskesmas Pegambiran Kota Cirebon Tahun 2018. Keterpaparan terhadap informasi (p value = 0,014), dukungan keluarga (p value = 0,018) dan dukungan petugas kesehatan (pvalue= 0,006) ada hubungan dengan pemberian ASI eksklusif di Kelurahan Pegambiran Wilayah Kerja UPT Puskesmas Pegambiran Kota Cirebon Tahun 2018.Kata Kunci : ASI eksklusif, determinan perilaku ABSTRACTExclusive breastfeeding is the only granting exclusive breast milk alone without additional food and other drinks to infants from birth to 6 months old. Breastfeeding exclusively influenced by a variety of factors which include the factor of education, work, knowledge, exposure to information, family support and support for health workers. Scope of exclusive breastfeeding in Kelurahan Pegambiran UPT Clinic work area amounted to 54.7% and has not met the target of 75%. The purpose of this research is to know the relationship between the determinants of behavior with exclusive breastfeeding in Kelurahan Pegambiran UPT Clinic work area Pegambiran the city of Cirebon in the Year 2018. This research method using descriptive analytic study design with cross sectional approach. The population in this research totalled 154 7-11 months old baby with samples as many as 65 people were selected based on the method of propotional random sampling. Research data retrieval by using a questionnaire with interview techniques. Test analysis to look at the relationship of free variables and bound variables with the Chi Square test. Based on the results of the study, pointed out that there is no relationship between the mother's education (p value = 0.785), the work of the mother (p value = 1,000), mothers knowledge (p value = 0.977), exposure to information (p value = 0.014), family support (p value = 0.018) and support health workers (p value = 0.006) with exclusive breastfeeding in Kelurahan Pegambiran UPT Clinic work area Pegambiran the city of Cirebon in the year 2018.Keywords : Exclusive breastfeeding, determinant of behavior

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal KesehatanSame topicPublic Health and NutritionFrench-language works237,207