Study on the Influencing Factors of Business Success Variables of Technology Startup Entrepreneurs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The impact of demographic factors on the business performance of entrepreneurs was investigated and the results suggest the direction of government's employment policy for strengthening, revitalizing the entrepreneurial ecosystem.Methods/Statistical analysis: We surveyed 300 young start-up entrepreneurs, 205 questionnaires were collected and analyzed using SPSS 22 and Smart PLS 3.2.9. Measurement and structural models were analyzed to evaluate path coefficients and structural suitability. Among the demographic variables, gender was introduced as a control variable, and PLS-Algorithm and Bootstrapping were performed on 8 independent paths and parameters to verify and confirm the difference in the moderating effect according to gender.Findings: We analyzed the measurement model to analyze internal consistency reliability, focused validity and discriminant validity, and validated the structural model by evaluating the importance and suitability of the determinants (R2): effect size (f2): multicollinearity (Inner VIF): and path coefficients. As a result of estimating the path coefficients (mean, STDEV, T-value, P-value, confidence interval): EX-S→TM-A, NW-C→ TECH-P, NW-C→ TIC-A, NW-C→TM-A, TCC-C→ TC-A, TECH-C→ TC-A, TECH-C→ TECH-P, TECH-C→TIC-A, TECH-C→TM-A has been adopted. In this paper, as a result of the analysis of the regulatory effect, which is a key differentiating factor from previous studies, among the 8 demographic variables, such as gender, type of manufacturing, start-up period, etc. TECH-C-GENDER→ TECH-P, MGC-DIV→TECH-P and TECH-C-YEAR→TECH-P were found to have a significant impact on business performance. In conclusion, the results of structural modeling of the factors that affect the business success of technology startups contribute to the establishment of start-up policies for start-up agencies and governments.Improvements/Applications: We will break down the technology sector into manufacturing, non-manufacturing, IT, AI, and big data and add data group analysis on demographic variables to conduct research on more advanced topics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".