Review: Enteral immunonutrition reduces infection risk, days on ventilation, and hospital stay in critically ill patients
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
TherapeuticsJuly 1, 2000Review: Enteral immunonutrition reduces infection risk, days on ventilation, and hospital stay in critically ill patientsDaren K. Heyland, MD, MSc, Frantisek Novak, MDDaren K. Heyland, MD, MScKingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (D.K.H., F.N.)Search for more papers by this author, Frantisek Novak, MDKingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (D.K.H., F.N.)Search for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/ACPJC-2000-133-1-009 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail Source CitationBeale RJ, Bryg DJ, Bihari DJ. Immunonutrition in the critically ill: a systematic review of clinical outcome. Crit Care Med. 1999 Dec;27:2799-805. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10628629References1 Heys SD, Walker LG, Smith I, Eremin O. Enteral nutritional supplementation with key nutrients in patients with critical illness and cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Ann Surg. 1999;229:467-77. Google Scholar2 Atkinson S, Sieffert E, Bihari D. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial of enteral immunonutrition in the critically ill. Guy’s Hospital Intensive Care Group. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:1164-72. Google Scholar3 Bower RH, Cerra FB, Bershadsky B, et al. Early enteral administration of a formula (Impact) supplemented with arginine, nucleotides, and fish oil in intensive care unit patients: results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized, clinical trial. Crit Care Med. 1995;23:436-49. Google Scholar Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (D.K.H., F.N.) PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails July 1, 2000Volume 133, Issue 1Page: 9KeywordsArginineClinical trial reportingDiarrheaFatty acidsFearGlutamineInformation storage and retrievalIntensive care unitsNucleotidesNutritionRespiratorsSystematic reviews ePublished: 9 March 2020 Issue Published: July 1, 2000 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2000 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF downloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it