Âges d’or et fausses nostalgies : Entre imaginaire vintage et déjà vu. Une analyse du discours nostalgique dans la culture populaire contemporaine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le concept de faux souvenir n’est en rien nouveau; son existence remonte aux balbutiements de la psychanalyse et de la psychologie clinique. La photographie de famille présente à cet égard une situation d’énonciation toute particulière. En effet, même lorsque le référent (la personne photographiée) n’a guère de souvenirs de l’occasion en soi, la codification, le sens de l’image, le lien de connaissance, la réappropriation mémorielle de l’événement, aussi artificiels soient-ils, peuvent être établis par le biais d’un récit externe. Une manipulation du même acabit est à l’origine du succès des séries Stranger Things, Riverdale et Chilling Adventures of Sabrina qui usent d’un imaginaire vintage et déjà vu pour bercer dans une douce nostalgie toute une génération de téléspectateurs bien trop jeunes pour en saisir pleinement les références.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".