MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3027785986 · doi:10.7759/cureus.8272

Trichoblastomas Mimicking Basal Cell Carcinoma: The Importance of Identification and Differentiation

2020· review· en· W3027785986 on OpenAlexaff
Parth Patel, Shiri Nawrocki, Kelsey Hinther, Amor Khachemoune

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer and Skin Lesions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBasal cell carcinomaMedicinePathologyMalignancyPapuleBiopsyCarcinomaBasal cellLesion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Trichoblastoma is a rare, slow-growing, benign cutaneous tumor derived from follicular germinative cells. Trichoblastoma commonly appears as an asymptomatic, symmetrical, well-circumscribed, skin-colored to brown or blue-black papule or nodule. It may appear clinically and histologically similar to basal cell carcinoma, making its diagnosis challenging. Even on dermoscopy, it is challenging to differentiate trichoblastoma from basal cell carcinoma. In practice, it is important to differentiate the two, because the choice of treatment and resulting prognosis differ between the lesions. Surgical biopsy to analyze histopathological and immunohistochemical differences is the gold standard for diagnosing and differentiating trichoblastoma from basal cell carcinoma. Trichoblastoma typically has a favorable prognosis, with a low incidence of recurrence, progression or association with malignancy. This paper provides a review of the epidemiology, clinical presentation, dermoscopy, histology, immunochemistry, treatment, and prognosis of trichoblastoma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureusSame topicCancer and Skin LesionsFrench-language works237,207