S187. EXPLORING NEURODEVELOPMENTAL AND FAMILIAL ORIGINS OF NEUROLOGICAL SOFT SIGNS IN SCHIZOPHRENIA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background The neurodevelopmental hypothesis is the most widely regarded framework for understanding the development of schizophrenia. One of the most commonly cited pieces of evidence for this theory is the presence of neurological soft signs (NSS) in individuals prior to the onset of psychosis. Increased NSS is also reported in unaffected individuals with a family history of schizophrenia, suggesting that NSS may also have a familial component. Although much research has implicated reduced grey matter volume (GMV) in association with these signs, a subcomponent of volume, known as gyrification, has been poorly researched. Given that gyrification develops predominantly in prenatal life it may be particularly susceptible to a neurodevelopmental abnormality. The aims of this study were to investigate the neurodevelopmental and familial underpinnings of NSS in schizophrenia. Specifically, we examined the brain structural correlates, at both the level of GMV and gyrification, of NSS in individuals with schizophrenia, their unaffected relatives and healthy controls. We aimed to determine whether gyrification better predicted NSS severity than GMV, and whether the relationship between brain structure and NSS were present in a step-wise manner across the diagnostic groups. Methods The sample consisted of individuals with schizophrenia (N=66), their unaffected relatives (N=27) and healthy controls (N=53). NSS was assessed with the Neurological Evaluation Scale (NES), and GMV and gyrification were extracted from MRI using the FreeSurfer imaging suite. A series of analysis of covariance were used to compare NES scores and brain measures between the groups. Separate linear regression analyses were used to assess whether whole-brain GMV and gyrification predicted NES above a covariate-only model. Moderation analyses were used to assess whether the relationship between NES and brain structure were different between the diagnostic groups. Error control was achieved with a false discovery rate of 5%. Results NES was significantly higher in schizophrenia patients than relatives (p<.0001), who were in turn significantly higher than controls (p=.034). With the groups combined, lower GMV (p<.0001), as well as lower gyrification (p=.004), predicted higher NES above a covariate-only model. GMV predicted greater variance in NSS in comparison to gyrification, explaining an additional 20.3% of the variance in NES, in comparison to the additional 5.5% of variance in NES explained by gyrification. Diagnostic group moderated the association between GMV and NES (p=.019), but not between gyrification and NES (p=.245). Follow-up tests revealed that lower GMV was associated with higher NES in schizophrenia (t=-4.5, p<.0001) and relatives (t=-2.5, p=.015) but not controls (t=-1.9, p=.055). Discussion Our findings indicate that NSS is heritable, being present in patients with established schizophrenia, and to a lesser extent, in unaffected relatives. Consistent with previous research, we revealed that GMV predicted NSS severity, suggesting that abnormalities in volume may underlie these signs. We additionally found that gyrification predicted, although to a lesser extent than volume, NSS severity, providing some support for schizophrenia being of possible neurodevelopmental origin. Evidence for an association between volume and NSS in relatives, whom are not confounded by illness-related factors such as medication and symptom severity, indicates a familial contribution to the neural underpinnings of NSS. Together, our study suggests that there may be various aetiological pathways underlying soft signs across the schizophrenia diathesis, some that may be of familial or neurodevelopmental origin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".