MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3027916978

Explaining Yang Mills Theory and Mass Gap and Proton Mass Based on Mathematical Heuristics

2020· preprint· en· W3027916978 on OpenAlexaff
S. Suresh

Bibliographic record

VenueviXra · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions Research
Canadian institutionsCanadian Society of Intestinal Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsQuantum chromodynamicsQuark–gluon plasmaQuantum hydrodynamicsQuarkMass gapQuantum electrodynamicsParticle physicsQuantum mechanicsQuantum
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydrodynamic of vortex flows can explain quark gluon plasma fluid flows as an highly idealized liquid which has transition to a hadronic phase to account for nuclear matter components like protons.The mass of quarks are only in a tiny part derived from the Higgs field mechanisms. Strong forces in the atomic nucleus hold together quarks and gluons in the protons as components of nuclear matter. QCD theories are sought to account for the strong fields and hadron mass. There are possible correspondence and analogies with quantum hydrodynamic and its conformal thermodynamics,which might explain the mass gap based on turbulence of vortex flows and its shock wave like energy dissipation leading to a thermodynamics and its momentum or mass derivations. The yang mills theory emerges as an interphase of quantum electrodynamics,vortex hydrodynamics and conformal thermodynamics,so that the nuclear matter and hadronic phase has entropy and information transfers to experience a Higgs like mechanism and phonon modes for self interactions leading to mass and momentum effects. The mathematical models of Hamilton Jacobi equations for positive and negative mass ensembles approximate to a Stochastic NLSE as a Schrodinger expression derivation of Lindblad master equation for heavy quark QCD or QED models. The negative mass like effects can occur in spin orbit coupled high angular momentum idealized fluids at relativistic limits and quantum limits ,explained by GP equations as NLSE approximations for hydrodynamic plasma vortex flows. The hydrodynamics has analogies with QED,and conform to thermodynamics in the entropic limits,and its dissipative turbulence and fluctuations in energy. The Higgs like phonon modes are the result of angular momentum and mass or energy distribution and equilibrium processes described by LG Boltzman equations corresponding to Schrodinger equations in the non linear limits. The self interaction potential can explain mass gap and gluon condensates,and yang mills theory based topological phases with quark hadron transitions and symmetry breaking,that is a combination of the QED,hydrodynamic and thermodynamic energy and mass- momentum transfers,and confining hadronic pressures due to negative mass effects.This paper presents a heuristic model to examine this.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.007
Scholarly communication0.0020.007
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueviXraSame topicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions ResearchFrench-language works237,207