MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3027965607 · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbaa028.016

O3.5. EARLY TRAJECTORIES OF POSITIVE SYMPTOMS REMISSION IN FIRST EPISODE-PSYCHOSIS: A 2-YEAR FOLLOW-UP STUDY

2020· article· en· W3027965607 on OpenAlexaff
Olivier Percie du Sert, Manish Dama, Michael Groff, Ridha Joober, Martín Lepage, Ashok Malla

Bibliographic record

VenueSchizophrenia Bulletin · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoDouglas Mental Health University InstituteMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychosocialPsychosisIntervention (counseling)Psychological interventionSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)PsychologyPsychiatryAntipsychoticGlobal Assessment of FunctioningClinical psychologyEarly psychosisMental healthMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The Prevention and Early intervention Program for Psychosis (PEPP) provides young people with first episode psychosis (FEP) rapid access to appropriate mental health services designed on the principles of early intervention (EI). We have previously demonstrated high rates of positive symptom (PS) remission. However, the relationship between PS, negative symptoms (NS) and functional outcomes remains unclear. Adherence to medication and early treatment response have been shown to be important independent determinants of the level of, and time to, symptom and functional remission, respectively. While trajectories of symptom severity have been shown to be heterogeneous, no previous study has investigated the prognosis of PS remission among individuals with FEP treated in an EI service. Identification of different trajectories of PS remission is a useful strategy to provide insight into clinically meaningful subgroups of patients while providing valuable information on NS and functioning for improving treatment outcomes. Methods The 2-year treatment at PEPP comprises different psychosocial (i.e., cognitive behavioral therapy, group intervention, family intervention, individual placement and support program) and psychopharmacological interventions (i.e., minimum effective dosage of second-generation antipsychotics). Monthly assessments were conducted from baseline to month 24. A total of 387 FEP patients, aged 14–35 years, with DSM IV affective or non-affective psychosis and little or no prior antipsychotic treatment (i.e., < 30 days) were included. PS remission was defined as absence of overt psychotic symptoms (i.e., all global SAPS items ≤ 2). A Latent Class Growth Analysis (LCGA) was used to investigate the distinct trajectories based on cumulative length of PS remission assessed at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 months of treatment. Predictors of trajectories were investigated among sociodemographic, pre-treatment, as well as baseline and course clinical characteristics. Chi-square tests, one-way and mixed ANOVAs identified which baseline and longitudinal variables differed between and within trajectories. Candidate predictors that were statistically significant were then entered into a multinomial regression model to determine which factors independently predict trajectory membership. Results Three distinct trajectories of PS remission were identified. Excellent (68%), unstable (15%) and poor (17%) trajectory. Trajectories differed at baseline in DUP, diagnosis of affective psychosis and PS severity. Over the 24 months of treatment, negative, depressive, anxiety and mania symptoms, as well as functioning, best improved in the excellent trajectory among which patients were prescribed less antipsychotics in term of chlorpromazine equivalent than patients in other trajectories. Multinomial regression of baseline characteristics revealed that absence of early treatment response at 3 months (adjusted OR=2.53; 95%CI=1.24–5.16) independently predicted poorer trajectory. Discussion These results highlight the heterogeneous prognosis of PS remission suggesting that the diversity in FEP response and phenotypes may be determined by different pathophysiological underpinnings. The fact that early response was found to be a strong predictor of PS remission supports early and adequate symptom control for which medication is a critical issue. Further research applying data-driven trajectory analysis in FEP is warranted to facilitate better characterization of longer-term patterns of remission and development of targeted intervention to promote early recovery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSchizophrenia BulletinSame topicSchizophrenia research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207