Application of neural networks for the reliability design of a tunnel in karst rock mass
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper offers a solution to overcome time-consuming numerical analysis for the evaluation of the impact of tunnel construction in a complex karst environment by implementing Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) using a neural network (NN) tool. The rock mass is described using three parameters: Geological Strength Index, the uniaxial compression strength of the intact rock, and the Hoek–Brown parameter for the intact rock m i . By using their probabilistic distribution as an input, a developed neural network NetTUNN produces probabilistic distributions of tunnel crown displacement, rock bolt axial load, and shotcrete uniaxial compression stress. A full MCS is then applied on these NetTUNN outputs to determine the reliability index and probability of failure for the relevant limit states. To demonstrate the potential of NN in tunnel design, a case study of Tunnel Pećine in Croatia is used, where the NetTUNN-assisted MCS assessment served as a benchmark to evaluate approximate reliability assessment techniques. It was shown that the developed NN can be used as an accurate surrogate model for determination of probabilistic distributions of tunnel design parameters. Further, it was shown that approximate reliability assessment techniques generally overestimate the reliability index and underestimate the probability of failure when compared to the NetTUNN-assisted MCS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".