GEV Beamforming Supported by DOA-Based Masks Generated on Pairs of Microphones
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Distant speech processing is a challenging task, especially when dealing with the cocktail party effect. Sound source separation is thus often required as a preprocessing step prior to speech recognition to improve the signal to distortion ratio (SDR). Recently, a combination of beamforming and speech separation networks have been proposed to improve the target source quality in the direction of arrival of interest. However, with this type of approach, the neural network needs to be trained in advance for a specific microphone array geometry, which limits versatility when adding/removing microphones, or changing the shape of the array. The solution presented in this paper is to train a neural network on pairs of microphones with different spacing and acoustic environmental conditions, and then use this network to estimate a time-frequency mask from all the pairs of microphones forming the array with an arbitrary shape. Using this mask, the target and noise covariance matrices can be estimated, and then used to perform generalized eigenvalue (GEV) beamforming. Results show that the proposed approach improves the SDR from 4.78 dB to 7.69 dB on average, for various microphone array geometries that correspond to commercially available hardware.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".