MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3028192224 · doi:10.29173/cf571

"Le fil des kilomètres" (2013) de Christian Guay-Poliquin : la déconstruction du sens

2020· article· fr· W3028192224 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Steven Urquhart

Bibliographic record

VenueConvergences francophones · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse multidisciplinary academic research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette contribution s'intéresse à la déconstruction de la quête du sens du personnage principal . L'histoire d'un homme qui quitte ce qui rappelle Fort McMurray lors d'une panne d'électricité transnationale pour aller retrouver son père malade, Le fil des kilomètres met en scène un voyage non-initiatique et une sorte de death drive dans un cadre qui devient de plus en plus dystopique au fur et à mesure que le protagoniste anonyme avance vers l'est d'un pays immense innommé. Hanté par un cauchemar qui rappelle le mythe grec du minotaure, le protagoniste se sent poursuivi en même temps qu'il poursuit une certaine plénitude fatale et irréalisable. Porteur d'un discours qui déconstruit de façon implicite l'idéal progressiste de l'Occident, ce roman d'anticipation joue sur la psychanalyse et laisse entendre qu'il est impossible de se débarrasser de la bête et de sortir du labyrinthe qu'incarne le monde. A la fois troublant et fort ironique, le roman constitue une sorte d'anti-road novel. Le fil conducteur du roman se défait et le roman finit par insister sur une certaine immobilité qui se rattache en fin de compte au retour éternel nietzschéen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.092

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.012
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConvergences francophonesSame topicDiverse multidisciplinary academic researchFrench-language works237,207