MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3028229089 · doi:10.18280/ts.370207

A Multi-class SVM Based Content Based Image Retrieval System Using Hybrid Optimization Techniques

2020· article· en· W3028229089 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceClass (philosophy)Support vector machineContent-based image retrievalArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Content (measure theory)Image (mathematics)Data miningImage retrievalMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to the increasing usage of multimedia and storage devices accessible, searching for large image databases has become imperative. Furthermore, the handiness of high-speed internet has escalated the exchange of images by users enormously. Content-Based Image Retrieval is proposed in this work, taking features based on Exact Legendre Moments, HVS color quantization with dc coefficient and statistical properties such as variance, mean, and skew of Conjugate Symmetric Sequency Complex Hadamard Transform (CS-SCHT). In most of the machine learning tasks, the quality of the learning process depends on dimensionality. High dimensional datasets can influence the classification outcome and training time. To overcome this problem, we use DE (Differential Evolution) to generate the optimal feature subsets. The features scaled by weights derived from the firefly algorithm, which fed to Multi-Class SVM. The fitness function taken for the firefly algorithm is the classification error of SVM. By minimizing fitness function, optimum weights are obtained. When these optimal weights are applied to SVM, the proposed algorithm exhibits better precision, recall, and accuracy when compared to some of the existing algorithms in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.536
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it