MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3028255754 · doi:10.29173/wclawr8

Miscarriages of Justice in Canada: Causes, Responses, Remedies (Kathryn M. Campbell)

2020· article· en· W3028255754 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Jonathan Freedman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Wrongful Conviction Law Review · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCriminal Law and Evidence
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvictionEconomic JusticeHappeningSubtitleLawSociologyPsychologyPolitical scienceHistoryPhilosophyLinguisticsPerformance art

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This book covers a great deal of material related to wrongful conviction or as the book terms it miscarriages of justice. As the subtitle says, the book deals with the causes, responses, and remedies. There is a wealth of information in the book that could serve as an introduction to this very important topic. It would be appropriate as a textbook for a course for undergraduates or even graduates or law students who want to learn about what causes wrongful convictions and how to prevent them from happening in the future. In that sense the book is a successful venture written by a very knowledgeable person and presented in a logical, thorough way.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.852
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Wrongful Conviction Law ReviewSame topicCriminal Law and EvidenceFrench-language works237,207