MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3028419811

Parenting practices among African immigrant families in North America

2019· article· en· W3028419811 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ibukunoluwa Adekoya, Ada L. Sinacore

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicParental Involvement in Education
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmigrationFace (sociological concept)Political sciencePerceptionSociologyEconomic growthGender studiesGeographyPsychologySocial science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

African cultures have rich heritages of values and practices for raising children. Hence, when individuals from African countries—including Nigeria— immigrate to North American countries (e.g., Canada and the United States), they often face dilemmas on integrating their parenting practices with the norms surrounding parenting in North America. Given the limited research on African immigrants in North America, their parenting practices have often been misunderstood and pathologized in the media and social services. This paper therefore aims at providing a critical review of the literature on African immigrants’ parenting practices in North America. The discussion will include a summary of research findings examining parents’ values about parenting, children’s perceptions of parenting styles, and intergenerational relationships among African immigrant families in North America. Implications for future research were discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.115

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicParental Involvement in EducationFrench-language works237,207