MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3028491896 · doi:10.17032/shu-170007

Reading Digital Fiction Project Hyperlink Study data

2017· article· en· W3028491896 on OpenAlexaff
Alice Bell, Astrid Ensslin, R. Lyle Skains, Isabelle van der Bom

Bibliographic record

VenueSheffield Hallam University Research Data Archive (SHURDA) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAuthorship Attribution and Profiling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperlinkReading (process)Session (web analytics)World Wide WebComputer scienceLinguisticsWeb page

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

These data were collected November 2016 at Bangor University, Bangor, Wales, UK, as part of the Reading Digital Fiction project study on hyperlinks. Nineteen people participated in the study. The significant data collection consisted of an audio-recorded structured reading of a piece of digital fiction and an associated structured interview. The digital fiction was The Futographer by Lyle Skains (2016): http://lyleskains.com/Twine/The_Futographer.html The transcripts are anonymised transcriptions of the structured reading session for each participant. For linguistic analysis purposes, please note that the following participants are not native speakers of English: BGR106 Mariela, BGR108 Ravi, and BGR118 Ping Yee

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science
Consensus categoriesOpen science
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.007
Open science0.0170.025
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.384
GPT teacher head0.437
Teacher spread0.053 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSheffield Hallam University Research Data Archive (SHURDA)Same topicAuthorship Attribution and ProfilingFrench-language works237,207