Bibliographic record
Abstract
目的 探讨知-信-行模式在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征(OSAHS)患者健康教育中 的应用效果.方法 将118例OSAHS患者按照随机数字表法分为实验组和对照组,每组59例,对照组患者接受常规健康教育,实验组将知-信-行模式应用于健康教育中,比较两组患者对疾病相关知识的认知水平和生活质量情况.结果 健康教育后,实验组Calgary睡眠呼吸暂停生活质量指数(SAQLI)各维度评分中日常活动(6.7±0.9)分,社会交往(6.8±0.7)分,情感(6.7±0.9)分,症状(5.8±1.2)分,均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t值分别为5.741 0,6.082 0,5.9449,4.582 3；P＜0.05)；实验组患者对OSAHS疾病各方面知识的知晓情况优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).结论 对OSAHS患者通过知-信-行模式进行健康教育,可以提高患者对疾病知识掌握程度以及患者的生活质量水平。
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.055 | 0.119 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".