MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3028689647 · doi:10.1139/bcb-2020-0106

The <i>N</i>-glycans of lactoferrin: more than just a sweet decoration

2020· review· en· W3028689647 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kristina Zlatina, Sebastian P. Galuska

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicInfant Nutrition and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLactoferrinGlycosylationGlycoproteinGlycanGolgi apparatusEndoplasmic reticulumBiochemistryBiologyCell biologyExtracellularChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nearly all extracellular proteins undergo post-translational modification with sugar chains during their transit through the endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi apparatus. These “sweet” modifications not only influence the activity of its carrier protein, but they themselves often have bioactivity, independent of the carrier function. Lactoferrin belongs to the group of glycoproteins and is modified with several different N-glycans. This minireview summarizes several studies dealing with the diverse glycosylation patterns of lactoferrin from different origins, and the potential impact of these post-translational modifications on the functionality of lactoferrin. A special emphasis is placed on the differences between human and bovine lactoferrin, because the latter form is often selected for the development of novel therapeutic approaches in humans. For this reason, the potential impact of the bovine-specific glycosylation patterns on the observed heterogeneous effects of lactoferrin in humans is discussed within this minireview.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations61
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicInfant Nutrition and HealthFrench-language works237,207