MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3028710516 · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12438-5

Landscape of multi-nucleotide variants in 125,748 human exomes and 15,708 genomes

2020· article· en· W3028710516 on OpenAlexaff
Qingbo S. Wang, Emma Pierce‐Hoffman, Beryl B. Cummings, Jessica Alföldi, Laurent C. Francioli, Laura D. Gauthier, Andrew Hill, Anne O’Donnell‐Luria, Irina M. Armean, Eric Banks, Louis Bergelson, Kristian Cibulskis, Ryan L. Collins, Kristen M. Connolly, Miguel Covarrubias, Mark J. Daly, Stacey Donnelly, Yossi Farjoun, Steven Ferriera, Stacey Gabriel, Jeff Gentry, Namrata Gupta, Thibault Jeandet, Diane Kaplan, Kristen M. Laricchia, Christopher Llanwarne, Eric Vallabh Minikel, Ruchi Munshi, Benjamin M. Neale, Sam Novod, Nikelle Petrillo, Timothy Poterba, David Roazen, Valentín Ruano-Rubio, Andrea Saltzman, Kaitlin E. Samocha, Molly Schleicher, Cotton Seed, Matthew Solomonson, José Soto, Grace Tiao, Kathleen Tibbetts, Charlotte Tolonen, Christopher Vittal, Gordon Wade, Arcturus Wang, James S. Ware, Nicholas A. Watts, Ben Weisburd, Nicola Whiffin, Carlos A. Aguilar‐Salinas, Tariq Ahmad, Christine M. Albert, Diego Ardissino, Gil Atzmon, John Barnard, Laurent Beaugerie, Emelia J. Benjamin, Michael Boehnke, Lori L. Bonnycastle, Erwin P. Böttinger, Donald W. Bowden, Matthew J. Bown, John C. Chambers, Juliana C.N. Chan, Daniel I. Chasman, Judy H. Cho, Mina K. Chung, Bruce M. Cohen, Adolfo Correa, Dana Dabelea, Dawood Darbar, Ravindranath Duggirala, Josée Dupuis, Patrick T. Ellinor, Roberto Elosúa, Jeanette Erdmann, Tõnu Esko, Martti Färkkilâ, José C. Florez, André Franke, Gad Getz, Benjamin Gläser, Stephen J. Glatt, David Goldstein, Clicerio González, Leif Groop, Christopher Haiman, Craig L. Hanis, Matthew B. Harms, Mikko Hiltunen, Matti Holi, Christina M. Hultman, Mikko Kallela, Jaakko Kaprio, Sekar Kathiresan, Bong-Jo Kim, Young Jin Kim, George Kirov, Jaspal S. Kooner, Seppo Koskinen, Harlan M. Krumholz, Subra Kugathasan, Soo Heon Kwak, Markku Laakso, Terho Lehtimäki, Ruth J. F. Loos, Steven A. Lubitz, Ronald C.W., Jaume Marrugat, Kari M. Mattila, Steven A. McCarroll, Mark I. McCarthy, Dermot McGovern, Ruth McPherson, James B. Meigs, Olle Melander, Andres Metspalu, Peter M. Nilsson, Michael O‘Donovan, Döst Öngür, Lorena Orozco, Michael J. Owen, Aarno Palotie, Kyong Soo Park, Carlos N. Pato, Ann E. Pulver, Nazneen Rahman, Anne M. Remes, John D. Rioux, Samuli Ripatti, Dan M. Roden, Danish Saleheen, Veikko Salomaa, Nilesh J. Samani, Jeremiah M. Scharf, Heribert Schunkert, M. Benjamin Shoemaker, Pamela Sklar, Hilkka Soininen, Harry Sokol, Tim D. Spector, Patrick F. Sullivan, Jaana Suvisaari, E Shyong Tai, Yik Ying Teo, Ming T. Tsuang, Dan Turner, Teresa Tusié‐Luna, Erkki Vartiainen, Hugh Watkins, Rinse K. Weersma, Maija Wessman, James Wilson, Ramnik J. Xavier, Marquis P. Vawter, Konrad J. Karczewski, Daniel G. MacArthur

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Rare Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Heart InstituteUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCommon FundNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesWellcome TrustNational Human Genome Research InstituteNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Institute on AgingBritish Heart FoundationNational Cancer InstituteU.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesNational Institutes of HealthEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentRosetrees Trust
KeywordsGenomeBiologyGeneticsExomeComputational biologyHuman genomeExome sequencingHaplotype1000 Genomes ProjectMutationGeneSingle-nucleotide polymorphismAllele

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multi-nucleotide variants (MNVs), defined as two or more nearby variants existing on the same haplotype in an individual, are a clinically and biologically important class of genetic variation. However, existing tools typically do not accurately classify MNVs, and understanding of their mutational origins remains limited. Here, we systematically survey MNVs in 125,748 whole exomes and 15,708 whole genomes from the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). We identify 1,792,248 MNVs across the genome with constituent variants falling within 2 bp distance of one another, including 18,756 variants with a novel combined effect on protein sequence. Finally, we estimate the relative impact of known mutational mechanisms - CpG deamination, replication error by polymerase zeta, and polymerase slippage at repeat junctions - on the generation of MNVs. Our results demonstrate the value of haplotype-aware variant annotation, and refine our understanding of genome-wide mutational mechanisms of MNVs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.714
Threshold uncertainty score0.315

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations143
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicGenomics and Rare DiseasesFrench-language works237,207