Effects of psychological stress and social support on quality of life of patients with ulcerative colitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To explore effects of psychological stress and social support on quality of life of patients with ulcerative colitis(UC). Methods From February 2017 to February 2018, at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, the data of 167 patients with UC were collected, which included education levels, monthly per capita income of the family, course of the disease, Mayo score and Montreal classification.Psychological stress was evaluated by perceived stress scale (PSS). Social support was assessed by social support rate scale (SSRS). Quality of life was measured by the inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (IBDQ). Chi square test was performed for univariate correlation analysis, Pearson or Spearman correlation analysis was performed for the correlationship, and two classification logistic regression method was used for multivariate analysis. Results The PSS score was 23 (19, 31), and the SSRS score was 33.0 (29.0, 37.0), and the IBDQ score was 168.0(154.0, 183.0). The PSS score was negatively correlated with IBDQ scores (r=-0.590, P<0.01). SSRS score were positively correlated with the IBDQ score (r=0.329, P<0.01). The results of univariate correlation analysis indicated that the quality of life was higher in patients with high education, high monthly per capita income of the family, high medical insurance reimbarsement rate, clinical remission period and mild active period (χ2=4.338, 12.311, 9.896 and 25.159, all P<0.05). The results of multivariate analysis demonstrated that quality of life of patients with UC was correlated with psychological stress (odds ratio (OR)=0.871, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.815 to 0.932), type of medical insurance (OR=2.024, 95%CI 1.168 to 3.507), social support (OR=1.065, 95%CI 1.002 to 1.132) and clinical disease activity (OR=0.362, 95%CI 0.193 to 0.679) (all P<0.05). Conclusion The quality of life of patients with UC is not only correlated with clinical activity of the disease, but also correlated with psychological stress, social support and type of medical insurance. Key words: Colitis, ulcerative; Stress, psychological; Social support; Quality of life
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".