MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3028753292 · doi:10.1111/ter.12479

Geochronology of calcite‐filled joints, southeast Canada: Insight into Late Cretaceous deformation of eastern North America

2020· article· en· W3028753292 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Jennifer Spalding, David Schneider, Julie Brown

Bibliographic record

VenueTerra Nova · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nuclear Safety CommissionUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Nuclear Safety Commission
KeywordsGeologyCalciteCretaceousGeochronologyPaleontologyOrdovicianGeochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Resolving the timing of brittle tectonism is a challenge. We examined intra‐cratonic Middle Ordovician limestone bedrock that overlies Mesoproterozoic crystalline basement, which are both cut by ENE‐WSW trending fault zones that have historic M4‐5 earthquakes along their trace. Calcite‐filled mode I joints are ubiquitous within the strata, and are parallel to the modern stress field. Calcite δ18O and δ13C values are analogous to the bulk composition of Middle Ordovician limestones, and suggest vein formation from a source dominated by connate fluids of the host rock. U‐Pb geochronology of six calcite veins sealing ENE‐WSW oriented joints produced similar Cretaceous dates and were regressed together yielding a date of 96.8 ± 1.1 Ma (MSWD: 2.9). A Cenomanian age is consistent with the most recent reorientation of North America's compressive stress field, which is attributed to a change in spreading direction along the northern Mid‐Atlantic Ridge and is linked to a global plate reorganization event at ca. 105–100 Ma. These results suggest that the most recent redistribution of lateral stress was not a passive event, and generated brittle deformation and fluid flow at least 500 km inland of North America's Atlantic passive margin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTerra NovaSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207