MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3028756231 · doi:10.1088/1361-648x/ab96f1

o-C <sub>240</sub> : a new sp <sup>3</sup> -dominated allotrope of carbon

2020· article· en· W3028756231 on OpenAlexafffund
Adebayo A. Adeleke, Adebayo O. Adeniyi, Hu Tang, Huiyang Gou, Yansun Yao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Condensed Matter · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOrthorhombic crystal systemMaterials scienceCarbon fibersFracture toughnessCeramicBand gapVickers hardness testCrystallographyCrystal structureComposite materialChemistryOptoelectronicsMicrostructureComposite number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We report a new allotrope of carbon predicted from first principles simulations. This allotrope is formed in a simulated conversion of two-dimensional polymeric C 60 precursor subjected to uniaxial compression at high temperature. The structure is made up of 240 carbon atoms in an orthorhombic unit cell (termed as o-C 240 ) having a mixed sp 2 /sp 3 hybridization with the ratio of about 1:5. o-C 240 is stable at ambient condition and exhibits superior mechanical performance including optimum Vickers hardness (45 GPa) and fracture toughness (4.10 MPa m 1/3 ), outperforming most of widely used hard ceramics. The electronic structure reveals semiconducting ground state with an indirect band gap of 1.72 eV. The simple reaction pathway could accelerate discovery of this allotrope in laboratory, and the simultaneous occurrence of high fracture toughness, superhardness and semiconductivity is expected to find applications for this material.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Condensed MatterSame topicDiamond and Carbon-based Materials ResearchFrench-language works237,207