MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Early experience of aortic valve replacement with stentless porcine valve

2001· article· en· W3028821816 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
王春生, 丁文军, 赵东, 洪涛, Q. Zhao, 王宜青

Bibliographic record

Venue中华胸心血管外科杂志 · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAortic valve replacementAortic valveMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineStenosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

目的探讨无支架生物瓣的置入技术及其早期临床效果.方法对12例平均年龄65岁的主动脉瓣病变病人,选用St. Jude公司提供的Toronto SPV瓣膜,行主动脉瓣置换术.结果全组手术死亡1例,平均主动脉阻断时间(95.0±12.3)?min,其中单纯主动脉瓣置换者为(74.0±9.2)?min.术后1个月随访超声心动图显示均无主动脉瓣反流,跨瓣压差明显较其他人工瓣膜小,左心室舒张末期内径明显缩小,无栓塞、出血等并发症.结论尽管无支架生物瓣膜置入有一定难度,但其优良的血液动力学性能,提示其能提高病人的远期疗效.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue中华胸心血管外科杂志→Same topicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments→French-language works237,207→