MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Intraoperative reduction and internal fixation for atlanto-axial dislocation

2016· article· en· W3028840960 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lecheng Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueZhonghua chuangshang guke zazhi · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFixation (population genetics)Atlas (anatomy)Reduction (mathematics)Internal fixationSurgeryAtlanto-axial jointTraction (geology)Cervical spineAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atlanto-axial complex is the most important functional unit of the cervical spine. Atlanto-axial instability or dislocation, one of the most serious pathologies in spinal surgery, is often managed by posterior atlantoaxial fixation and fusion. Several posterior fixation techniques have been used to stabilize the atlanto-axial complex, including wire/cable-bone fixation, Halifax clamps, transarticular screw fixation, screw-plate fixation and screw-rod fixation. For atlanto-axial dislocation that cannot be reduced with skull traction before operation, intraoperative reduction is often needed. Current intraoperative reduction techniques can be classified into tran-soropharyngeal surgical release followed by posterior reduction and fixation, transoropharyngeal reduction and fixation, and posterior reduction and fixation using screw-rod system according to approaches. Furthermore, posterior reduction can be performed using elevating-pull, leverages, and cantilever techniques. This study re-views the intraoperative reduction and fixation techniques mentioned above. Key words: Atlas; Axis; Dislocation; Reduction; Internal fixation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.463
Threshold uncertainty score0.361

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZhonghua chuangshang guke zazhiSame topicSpinal Fractures and Fixation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207