MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3028923395 · doi:10.7202/1069624ar

Modernist Ultimate Thule

2020· article· fr· W3028923395 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Rhodri Windsor Liscombe

Bibliographic record

VenueRACAR Revue d art canadienne · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

À partir de la Seconde Guerre mondiale, le gouvernement fédéral canadien s’est de plus en plus intéressé à ses régions nordiques et arctiques, au « pays du nord, puissant et libre », imaginé dans le texte anglais de l’hymne national du Canada. Ces terres lointaines ont fourni les ressources minérales nécessaires à certaines opérations militaires et ont servi de sites à des installations stratégiques. Le développement de nouvelles infrastructures comme l’Alaska Highway – traversant davantage le territoire canadien qu’américain – a également exposé la précarité de l’autonomie canadienne. Les stratégies pour la canadianisation du nord ont été renforcées par la guerre froide et les politiques de développement, surtout sous le régime Diefenbaker. Des architectes comme Peter Dickinson et Ralph Erskine ont été invités à préparer les plans de nouvelles colonies, notamment Frobisher Bay (1958) et Resolute (1963), où l’on a déployé une technologie de construction de pointe à partir d’objectifs de planification issus du mouvement moderne. Cet épisode illustre la collusion ironique entre le mouvement moderne et les moteurs de la modernité que celui-ci avait l’intention de reformuler.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.257

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.008
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0770.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRACAR Revue d art canadienneSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207