MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect of the oral CXCR4 inhibitor X4-136 on tumor control and side effects in cervical cancer treated with radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy.

2020· article· en· W3028944537 on OpenAlexafffund
Naz Chaudary, Rićhard P. Hill, Lynne Kelley, Michael Milosevic

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
FundersTerry Fox Research Institute
KeywordsMedicineCervical cancerToxicityCisplatinChemotherapyCXCR4Radiation therapyCancerInternal medicineOncologyReceptorChemokine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e18010 Background: Cervical cancer is a global health problem. Despite scale up of prevention programs, there will be an ongoing need to improve the effectiveness of radiotherapy/cisplatin (RTCT) for women with established, locally advanced disease. We have shown that RTCT with the CXCR4 inhibitor plerixafor improves tumor control, reduces metastases and reduces RT-related side effects compared to RTCT alone. X4-136 is an oral CXCR4 inhibitor that is better suited to long-term, once daily use. In this study we examined: 1. The efficacy of RTCT and X4-136 in cervical cancer; 2. Biomarkers of response to RTCT and X4-136; and 3. Effects of RTCT and X4-136 on intestinal toxicity, an important dose-limiting RT side effect in these patients. Methods: Orthotopic cervical cancer xenografts derived from our patients were treated with RT (30 Gy; 2 Gy/day) and cisplatin (4 mg/kg/week ip) with or without concurrent X4-136 (100 mg/kg/day orally) for 3 weeks. Mice were sacrificed immediately after treatment for biomarker assessment. In separate experiments, mice had CT imaging weekly after treatment to evaluate tumor response. Acute and late intestinal toxicity was assessed histologically 3.5 and 90 days after treatment respectively. Results: RTCT alone increased CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling, intratumoral accumulation of myeloid cells and PD-L1 expression. The addition of X4-136 during RTCT abrogated these effects and improved tumor response in 2 cervical cancer models. Furthermore, the addition of X4-136 increased the proportion of surviving intestinal crypt cells in keeping with a reduction in acute RT toxicity, and reduced late histologic changes of late RT toxicity. Conclusions: The addition of X4-136 blunts RTCT-induced upregulation of the CXCL12/CXCR4 pathway, reduces intratumoral myeloid cells, improves tumor control and reduces side effects in cervical cancer. Few if any pharmacologic strategies have been identified previously that expand the therapeutic window with RT in this way. The combination of RTCT and CXCR4 inhibition warrants testing in clinical trials to validate these findings. These benefits may apply to other tumors where RTCT plays a curative role.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicGenomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stressFrench-language works237,207