MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3028960469

Bibliographie des imprimés féminins : textes composés, traduits ou édités par des femmes ou par des figures féminines et imprimés dans les territoires francophones entre 1550 et 1574

2017· article· fr· W3028960469 on OpenAlexaff
William Kemp, Hélène Hotton, Christian Veilleux

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue Littératures | Université McGill · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les pages qui suivent constituent la seconde partie de la bibliographie des textes ecrits ou traduits par des femmes et imprimes en France jusqu'en 1574. La premiere partie, parue dans le n° 18 de la revue Litteratures en 1998, etait consacree a la periode allant de 1488 a 1549. Deux choix methodologiques avaient preside a l'etablissement de ce premier repertoire: l'exclusion des textes manuscrits et celle de tout ce qui n'avait pas fait l'objet d'une publication autonome, ce qui avait eu pour consequence d'eliminer les contributions a des ouvrages collectifs de poesie ainsi que les textes liminaires.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.532
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.007
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue Littératures | Université McGillSame topicRenaissance Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207