A-Spline Regression for Fitting a Nonparametric Regression Function with Censored Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper aims to solve the problem of fitting a nonparametric regression function with right-censored data. In general, issues of censorship in the response variable are solved by synthetic data transformation based on the Kaplan–Meier estimator in the literature. In the context of synthetic data, there have been different studies on the estimation of right-censored nonparametric regression models based on smoothing splines, regression splines, kernel smoothing, local polynomials, and so on. It should be emphasized that synthetic data transformation manipulates the observations because it assigns zero values to censored data points and increases the size of the observations. Thus, an irregularly distributed dataset is obtained. We claim that adaptive spline (A-spline) regression has the potential to deal with this irregular dataset more easily than the smoothing techniques mentioned here, due to the freedom to determine the degree of the spline, as well as the number and location of the knots. The theoretical properties of A-splines with synthetic data are detailed in this paper. Additionally, we support our claim with numerical studies, including a simulation study and a real-world data example.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.042 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".