MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3029019011 · doi:10.3917/nrp.029.0089

L’emprise idéologique en contexte gériatrique au Québec. Accroissement des normes de qualité et culpabilisation des préposés

2020· article· fr· W3029019011 on OpenAlexaffabout
François Aubry

Bibliographic record

VenueNouvelle revue de psychosociologie · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les centres d’hébergement et de soins de longue durée ( chsld ), organisations accueillant des personnes en forte perte d’autonomie, peuvent être analysés comme des organisations paradoxantes. Le personnel préposé y subit une emprise idéologique qui se déploie autour de deux axes : d’une part, on observe un accroissement des contradictions entre les normes de qualité et la charge de travail ; d’autre part, on assiste à une individualisation du rapport à l’activité et aux normes qui produit chez les préposés un fort sentiment de culpabilité, compte tenu de leur incapacité à respecter les prescriptions. Les préposés peuvent créer et utiliser des stratégies pour jouer avec les prescriptions, mais ce jeu tend davantage à profiter à l’organisation, accentuant le sentiment de culpabilité des préposés.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.523

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0110.013
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.267
GPT teacher head0.466
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNouvelle revue de psychosociologieSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207