An Evaluation on Adaptability of Mechanical Biological Treatment in Tropical Region
Bibliographic record
Abstract
途上国において導入されつつある，都市ごみ (MSW) の選別と資源化を行い，埋立ごみを削減する技術である機械的・生物的処理 (MBT) について，東南アジアで稼働する施設のうちタイの 2 つの施設を紹介した上で，これら施設をモデルケースとして，運用期間全体の費用便益を分析した。これら MBT 施設では，都市ごみに含まれる水分を低減させるため，天日乾燥または生物発酵熱を利用したバイオドライ工程が取り入れられており，産物は工業用の燃料として利用されていた。MBT 施設の 20 年間の運用により，RDF 製造工程の費用と残渣処分の費用が小さいことが費用便益比 (CBR) に大きく影響していた。
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".