MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Risk factors of severe influenza A H1N1: a Meta-analysis

2019· article· en· W3029160167 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jiehong Li, Zhi Zheng, Yao Caixia, Chen Jing

Bibliographic record

VenueZhonghua xiandai huli zazhi · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOdds ratioConfidence intervalMeta-analysisInternal medicineIncidence (geometry)VaccinationImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To explore the risk factors of severe influenza A H1N1 by the Meta-analysis so as to provide a reference for prevention and control. Methods Literatures on risk factors of severe influenza A H1N1 were retrieved in Chinese Biomedical Medicine, China national knowledge internet (CNKI), Wanfang Database, VIP Database, PubMed and ProQuest from 1st January 2000 to 31st December 2018 by computer. Quality of literatures were evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) on standard quality evaluation. Heterogeneity test of literatures was analyzed with the RevMan 5.1, and the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated with the Meta-analysis. Results A total of 10 literatures were included. Among those literatures, there were 1 852 cases in case group, 3 049 cases in control group and 8 risk factors. Meta-analysis showed that the risk factors of severe influenza A H1N1 included ages ≤5 years (OR=6.09, 95%CI: 1.77-21.16) , pregnancy (OR=11.80, 95%CI: 6.91-20.16) , chronic underlying disease (OR=3.74, 95%CI: 2.34-5.97) , BMI≥30 kg/m2 (OR=4.48, 95%CI: 2.81-7.12) , time between attack and seeking medical advice≥48 h (OR=1.85, 95%CI: 1.50-2.28) and infected with HIV (OR=1.74, 95%CI: 1.33-2.27) with statistical differences (P<0.001) . Influenza vaccination which was a protective factor had a negative influence on incidence of severe influenza A H1N1 (OR=0.63, 95%CI: 0.49-0.82) . Conclusions Risk factors of severe influenza A H1N1 comprise ages≤5 years, pregnancy, chronic underlying disease, BMI≥30 kg/m2, time between attack and seeking medical advice≥48 h and infected with HIV, and influenza vaccination is a protective factor. Influenza vaccination can effectively reduce the incidence of severe influenza A H1N1 or slow down the disease progression. Evidence on gender as a risk factor of severe influenza A H1N1 is insufficient which needs to be tested by later researches. Key words: Influenza A virus, H1N1 subtype; Risk factors; Meta-analysis

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0210.063
Bibliometrics0.0080.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.135
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZhonghua xiandai huli zazhiSame topicInfluenza Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207