MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The influences of paroxetine modified Xiaoyao pill therapy on subjective well-beingfor type 2 diabetes patients with anxiety

2012· article· en· W3029234389 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTraditional Chinese Medicine · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraditional Chinese Medicine Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParoxetineMedicineAnxietyInternal medicineGlycated hemoglobinPillTraditional Chinese medicineType 2 diabetesDiabetes mellitusPhysical therapyPsychiatryEndocrinologyAntidepressantNursingAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To explore the influence of integrated Chinese and western medicine therapy on anxiety,sugar metabolism and subjective well-being for type 2 diabetes Patients associated with anxiety.Methods Use glycated hemoglobin (HbAlc),trait anxiety inventory(TAI),and Memorial University of Newfoundland Scale of Happiness (MUNSH) to evaluate the condition of 60 patients with type 2 diabetes associated with anxiety.The patients participated in the study were randomly divided into Western medicine therapy group(control group)and integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine therapy group (experimental group),with 30 cases in each group.The control group was treated with paroxetine while the experimental group was treated with paroxetine plus Jiawei-Xiaoyaowan.6 weeks after treatment,we tested the HbAlc level.TAI score and MUNSH score of those patients.Results After 6 weeks,the TAI score of patients in both experimental group and control group have obviously decreased (before treatment:54.07±6.41 and 56.33 ±6.01,respectively; after treatment:38.89±6.70 and 45.29±6.55,respectively) and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).And the TAI score of the two groups after treatment was significantly different (P<0.05).For both experimental and control groups,the HbA1e level were not obviously changed before and after the study with P>0.05 (before treatment:8.14±2.69 and 8.07±2.11,respectively; after treatment:8.21±2.07 and 7.92± 1.90,respectively).Comparison between groups also showed no significant difference.MUNSH score have obviously increased in experimental group (before treatment:40.49±5.22; after treatment:44.53 ± 6.28,P<0.05).The result of comparison between the two groups after treatment shows that MUNSH score of patients in the experimental group were obviously improved compared with patients in the control group (57.56 ±6.39),and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion The integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine therapy can obviously release anxiety and enhance subjective well-being in patients with cerebral infarction associated with anxiety. Key words: Type 2 diabetes; Anxiety; Glycated hemoglobin; Subjective well-being

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.880

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it