MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Study the position in bed for the patients who have used heparin sodium after percutaneous coronary intervention therapy

2006· article· en· W3029263531 on OpenAlex
王丽姿, 李秋玲, Feixiang Wei

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œJournal of practical nursing · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePercutaneous coronary interventionHeparinHeparin sodiumInternal medicineCardiologySurgeryMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

目的 探讨经皮冠状动脉腔内介入术(PCI)术后24h内静滴肝素期间的最佳卧位.方法将159例行PCI住院患者随机分半坐卧位组(实验组)和常规平卧组(对照组),分别按2种方式进行术后指导.用Christenson法评估血肿、McGill现有疼痛强度指数(PPI)评估腰背痛、Spielberger焦虑自评量表(STAI)来评定焦虑状态和特性、记录术后尿潴留例数.结果 2组在伤口出血方面差异无显著性,但术后6 h腰背痛、焦虑和尿潴留差异有显著性.结论术后使用肝素期间采用半坐位是安全的,且能有效提高患者的舒适度.高危患者不在本研究中。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.606
Threshold uncertainty score0.245

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it